A Comparative Approximation to the Chronotope of Pound’s Cantos

  • O. M. Gon Doctor of Philology, Associate professor, Professor at the Foreign Languages Department, Institute of International Realtions, National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv
Keywords: Pound, Tychyna, the Kyivan Neoclassicists


Pound’s vision of human history in Cantos challenges the clichéd assumption that the very phrase "American canon" (civilizational, historical, socio-political, philosophical, or aesthetic)
implies a foregone contemptuous oxymoron. As a long poem, it functions organically in the continuum of the American epic tradition founded by the Hartford Wits. The fundamental chronotope of Pound’s modern epic transforms the Enlightenment progressivist impulse of imperium sine fine dedi into a demiurgic discourse-centric "a continuous present" time based on Homer’s canon of in medias res. A multilevel artistic
chronotope in the Cantos is made up of and guided by the tenet of interaction, transfusion of the lyrical and the epic, the autobiographical and the historical, the fictional and the documentary components It is built on the modernist principle of montage that essentially depends on the demiurge concept and radically differs from the Renaissance, Baroque, Classicist, and Romantic long poems. It is against this backdrop of proleptic and etiological poetics in traditional epics and the function of the author’s word therein that constitutively original techniques of modern epic are made so pronouncedly perceived, including montage and kaleidoscopic optics, spontaneity of poetic expression, combination of social and artistic, self-conscious reflexivity, distrust of the consistency in the author or the speaker’s narrative. However, an opposite and reverse movement of parts can be traces down to even to the old-English long poems. Similarly, a shuttle-like or versified view of history as eternal repetition informs the chronotope of the Cantos. Pound employs versification as a derivative from versus, i. e. return, and follows the patterns of refrain-centered models of European fixed poetic forms which are extensively represented in the historical discourse of the poem. In the poems of Tychyna, Kyivan neoclassicists, and Mandelstam, this idea is embodied in isomorphic images of soil and plow that symbolize both the modernist demiurgic potential of the word to create worlds anew and the tragic fate of the Ukrainian "Executed Renaissance," expressed through the polysemantic boustrophedon-like images that seamlessly suggest the connotational halo of plow, arable land and versification.


1. Girin, Y. N. (Ed.). (2010). Avangard v kul’ture XX veka. 1900–1930: Teorija. Istorija. Poetika [Avant-garde in the culture of the twentieth century.
1900–1930: Theory. History. Poetics, in 2 vols. V. 2]. Moscow: IMLI RAN [In Russian].
2. Bila, A. (2006) Ukrains’kyj literaturnyj avanhard: poshuky, styl’ovi napriamky: monohrafiia [Ukrainian literary avant-garde: search, stylistic
directions: monograph]. Kyiv: Smoloskyp [in Ukrainian].
3. Stekh M. R., Poliuha M. (Eds.). (2017). Vybranyj Ezra Pavnd [Selected Ezra Pound, in 2 vols], v. 2. Kyiv: Penmen; Ukr. Propilei [in Ukrainian].
4. Gachev, G. D. (2008). Natsionalnyie obrazyi mira. Ellada, Germaniya, Frantsiya: opyit ekzistentsialnoy kulturologii [National images of the world. Hellas, Germany, France: the practice of existential culturology]. Moscow: Logos [In Russian].
5. Hromiak, R., Kovaliv, Y [Eds.]. (1997). Literaturoznavchyj slovnyk-dovidnyk [Literary Dictionary and Reference]. Kyiv: Akademiia [in Ukrainian].
6. Zerov, M. Kapnos tes partridos. URL: http://www. poetryclub. com.ua/metrs_poem. php?poem=1393 (Last accessed: 10. 02. 2019) [in Ukrainian].
7. Klen, Y. (1991). Vybrane [Selected Writings]. Kyiv: Dnipro [in Ukrainian].
8. Klen, Y. (2014). Pro genezu poemy "Popil imperij" [On the Genesis of the Long Poem The Ashes of the Empires]. In Stefanovska, L. (Ed.). MUR i
vidrodzhennia ukrains’koho literaturnoho zhyttia u taborakh dlia bizhentsiv na terytorii Nimechchyny. 1945–1948. [Artistic Ukrainian Movement and the Revival of Ukkrainian Literary Life in DP Camps in Germany. 1945–1948)], part II, Anthology of Source Texts. Warszawa: UW (pp. 239–241) .
9. Mandelshtam, О. (1987). Slovo i kultura: Stati [Word and Culture: Essays]. Moscow: Sovetskiy pisatel [In Russian].
10. Meletinskiy, E. M. (2006). Poetika mifa [The Poetics of the Myth]. Moscow: Vostochnyie literatury [In Russian].
11. Tychyna, P. Pluh [The Plow]. URL: https://www.ukrlib.com.ua/books/printit.php?tid=427 (Last accessed: 14. 04. 2020) [in Ukrainian].
12. Tyinyanov, Yu. N. Poetika. Istoriya literaturyi. Kino Poetics. [The History of Literature. Cinema]. Moscow: Nauka [In Russian].
13. Shevel’ov, Yu. (2009). Vybrani pratsi [Selected Writings], in 2 vols, v. 2 Literaturoznavstvo [Studies in Literature]. Kyiv: Vyd. dim "Kyievo Mohylians’ka akademiia" [in Ukrainian].
14. Auden, W. H. (1950). Collected Shorter Poems. 1930–1944. London: Faber and Faber.
15. Bernstein, M. A. (1980). The Tale of the Tribe: Ezra Pound and the Modern Verse Epic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16. Brodsky, J. (1995). On Grief and Reason. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
17. Ezra Pound in Context. ed. by I. B. Nadel. Cambridge, UK; New York, Cambridge University Press, 2010. 497 p.
18. Nadel, I. (Ed.). (2010). Ezra Pound in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Hulme T. E., (1955). Further Speculations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20. McGann, J. J. (Ed.). (2000). Lord Byron. The Major Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Poe, E. A. (1922). The Complete Poetical Works. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell company.
22. Pound E., ABC of Reading. New York: J. Laughlin, 1960.
23. Lehman D. (Ed.). (2006). The Oxford Book of American Poetry. Oxford: Oxford university press.
24. Paige D. D. (Ed.). The Selected Letters of Ezra Pound. 1907– 1941. London: Faber and Faber, 1971

Abstract views: 20
How to Cite
Gon, O. M. “A Comparative Approximation to the Chronotope of Pound’s Cantos”. Literature and Culture of Polissya, Vol. 98, no. 14f, May 2020, pp. 97-11, doi:10.31654/2520-6966-2020-14f-98-97-111.